Standing in for Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister’s Questions, Angela Rayner said the account was “horrifying” and that while the display of human remains was regulated by the Human Tissue Authority, “it does not cover sales or purchases”.
The deputy prime minister said she would ensure a meeting with Riberio-Addy to discuss the issue.
Riberio-Addy told the that the “commodification of human remains perpetuates a dark legacy of colonialism, exploitation and dehumanisation”.
“We need to see decisive action to end such practices and respectfully repatriate stolen remains to their rightful resting places,” she said.
She said she would continue to push the issue and that “restitution is a key pillar of any programme of reparative justice”.
The reported in October that an auction house in Oxfordshire had been forced to withdraw human and ancestral remains from a sale following criticism from native groups and museums.
Among the items initially listed were shrunken heads from the Jivaro people of South America, skulls from the Ekoi people of West Africa and a 19th century horned human skull from the Naga people of India and Myanmar.
Laura Van Broekhoven, who is the director of the Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford, said she was “outraged” at the auction and praised the decision to remove the remains from sale.
Ribeiro-Addy said in the Commons that alongside auction houses, remains could be sold on social media sites like Instagram, Facebook, Ebay, Etsy and Gumtree.
She said the remains were “often from indigenous communities in Africa and Asia stolen during colonial expeditions” and said had been told of the incidents by the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology (BABAO).
BABAO says the sale of human remains for commercial gain is “unethical”, and has warned that social media platforms are “ideal hosts for a wide variety of illicit activity” in the sale of remains.
The Human Tissue Act only bans “commercial dealings” of human tissue in the context of medical transplantation, rather than sale as artefacts.
In addition, it only covers remains under 100 years old, meaning many historic remains would not be in scope.
However, the display of remains does require a license. BABAO says many “antique” skeletons are actually under 100 years old as exports of remains to medical schools continued well into the 20th century, meaning unlicensed display of them would be unlawful.
BABAO told the that the instances raised by Ribeiro-Addy were “are all real cases reported to BABAO’s Trade and Sale of Human Remains Task Force over the past four years”.
“For example, the thigh bone (femur) modified into a walking cane was observed by a member of the task force on a market stall, and the skull of the six-year-old child was recently presented as a prize in a raffle conducted on Instagram,” a BABAO spokesperson said.
“Many similar items are currently available for sale at online antiques auctions, online marketplaces and on social media.”
They said their ultimate aim is to “ensure that the selling of human remains in the UK in this way is outlawed entirely”.
