Manchester City have welcomed the finding of an arbitration panel after chalking up a significant victory over the Premier League over sponsorship rules.
The Blues challenged the Premier League over its increasingly tight regulating of Associated Party Transaction Rules that were pushed through in 2021, months after Newcastle United’s takeover. Despite the changes over the last few years being agreed by the majority of clubs, an arbitration hearing in June agreed with City that the new rules did not make sense and must be addressed.
The implementation of both the original Association Party Transaction Rules in 2021 and subsequent amendments were deemed to be unlawful, and the tribunal found that the league’s treatment of City in two separate deals was ‘procedurally unfair’. On top of this, there were ‘unreasonable delays’ behind the decisions.
ALSO READ: Man City inflict heavy defeat on Premier League in legal challenge
ALSO READ: Man City win Premier League APT court case live updates and reaction
A statement on the club site read: “Following today’s publication of the Rule X Arbitral Tribunal Award, Manchester City Football Club thanks the distinguished members of the Arbitral Tribunal for their work and considerations and welcomes their findings:
– The Club has succeeded with its claim: the Associated Party Transaction (APT) rules have been found to be unlawful and the Premier League’s decisions on two specific MCFC sponsorship transactions have been set aside
– The Tribunal found that both the original APT rules and the current, (amended) APT Rules violate UK competition law and violate the requirements of procedural fairness.
– The Premier League was found to have abused its dominant position.
– The Tribunal has determined both that the rules are structurally unfair and that the Premier League was specifically unfair in how it applied those rules to the Club in practice.
– The rules were found to be discriminatory in how they operate, because they deliberately excluded shareholder loans.
– As well as these general findings on legality, the Tribunal has set aside specific decisions of the Premier League to restate the fair market value of two transactions entered into by the Club.
– The tribunal held that the Premier League had reached the decisions in a procedurally unfair manner.
– The Tribunal also ruled that there was an unreasonable delay in the Premier League’s fair market value assessment of two of the Club’s sponsorship transactions, and so the Premier League breached its own rules.
Click here to download page 164 of the judgment, which summarises the Tribunal’s decision.”
The Premier League also released a statement that struck a very different tone to City’s. “The Premier League welcomes the Tribunal’s findings, which endorsed the overall objectives, framework and decision-making of the APT system,” it read.
“The Tribunal upheld the need for the APT system as a whole and rejected the majority of Manchester City’s challenges. Moreover, the Tribunal found that the Rules are necessary in order for the League’s financial controls to be effective.
“The decision represents an important and detailed assessment of the APT Rules, which ensure clubs are not able to benefit from commercial deals or reductions in costs that are not at Fair Market Value (FMV) by virtue of relationships with Associated Parties. These Rules were introduced to provide a robust mechanism to safeguard the financial stability, integrity and competitive balance of the League.
“The Tribunal did, however, identify a small number of discrete elements of the Rules which do not, in their current form, comply with competition and public law requirements (more information below). These elements can quickly and effectively be remedied by the League and clubs.
“In the meantime, the Premier League will continue to operate the existing APT system, taking into account the findings made by the Tribunal.”
