A man has been brought before the court after he was found drunk while “riding” on a HORSE. Stuart Evans, 33, was discovered heavily intoxicated with the gelding outside a pub, following a report from a member of the public that he was using his horse and cart at dusk without any lights or reflective gear.
Officers reported that Evans became ‘argumentative’ and refused to provide his name and address when approached outside the Half Way House in Runcorn, Cheshire, on Boxing Day last year, where the horse and carriage were spotted in the car park. He was observed slurring his words and appeared unsteady on his feet after drinking heavily during the afternoon.
The pub has historically served as a resting stop for horse and carriage riders. Evans was charged under Section 12 of the Licensing Act for being drunk in charge of a horse, an offence which used to result in a 40 shilling fine or a month’s imprisonment with hard labour if they failed to pay.
READ MORE: LIVE: Trains cancelled and delayed as emergency services respond to incident – updates
READ MORE: DWP announces Cold Weather Payments for another 160 postcode areas in England – full list
Much of this ancient and archaic law has since been repealed, with the maximum fine now set at £200. However, individuals can still be prosecuted for being drunk in charge of cattle, a steam engine, and a bicycle under the terms of the law.
At Warrington Magistrates’ Court, Evans, a labourer who lives in Small Acre Caravan Park, Windmill Street, Runcorn, admitted the offence. He said: ”What was said is sufficiently accurate and I may as well go guilty as I don’t have much of a choice. I have no representation or anything.
”I want to get this dealt with and sorted out. I am between labouring, little bits and pieces. I am trying to get my photo identification to claim benefits.”
Join our WhatsApp Top Stories and, Breaking News group by clicking this link
The court heard the duty solicitor had viewed the charge sheet and said he did not need representation.
Earlier Louise Dempster, prosecuting, said: “On December 26 of last year, a report was made to police by a member of the public stating that on Halton Road in Runcorn there were two males going up and down the road with a horse and carriage with no lights or reflector strips and with no care or attention to other road users.
“When police arrived the horse and carriage was at the side of the Half Way House. A PC Moran approached the horse and the defendant who was near the horse and carriage.
“He admitted being in charge of the horse. He was said to be argumentative and would not provide his details. He admitted to having had alcohol to the police. He was slurring his words and unsteady on his feet.
“Police suspected that he was intoxicated. Therefore he was arrested for being drunk in charge of a horse.” After his arrest Evans was searched and the officer found a quantity of cannabis for personal use.”
The court clerk said of the legislation for being drunk in charge of a horse: “It is a common law offence which dates back quite some time ago. It is a matter for a financial penalty.”
JPs fined Evans £80 for possession of cannabis but made no separate penalty for being drunk in charge of a horse. He was also ordered to pay a £32 surcharge and £85 costs.
According the archaic Act, every person found drunk in any highway or other public place, whether a building or not, or on any licensed premises, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding ten shillings.
On a second conviction within a period of twelve months they can be liable to a penalty not exceeding twenty shillings, and on a third or subsequent conviction within such period of twelve months can be liable to a penalty not exceeding forty shillings.
It adds: ”Every person who in any highway or other public place, whether a building or not, is guilty while drunk of riotous or disorderly behaviour, or who is drunk while in charge on any highway or other public place of any carriage, horse, cattle, or. steam engine, or who is drunk when in possession of any loaded fire-arms, may be apprehended, and shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding forty shillings, or in the discretion of the court to imprisonment with or without hard labour for any term not exceeding one month.
”Where the court commits any person to prison for non-payment of any penalty under this section, the court may order him to be imprisoned with hard labour.”
